Talk:Spycraft

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

PC Game

There was a CD-ROM -based PC game, called "Spycraft", released in 1993 or thereabouts. Shouldn't that have an entry as well? It was certainly notable, as one of the first and most elaborate "interactive movies". --Peter Knutsen 11:03, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The PC game is completely unrelated to the rpg, so it shouldn't be on this page. Perhaps it deserves it's own page. --Cybogoblin 2240, 18 January 2006 (NZ Time)

Genre links

I'm not sure linking the "genre" words to anything is useful. Espionage, maybe, but linking "action" to Action game is pointless, because that article talks about computer and video games only. Any thoughts? Powers 13:16, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Conspiracies Sourcebook

Conspiracies is now available on DriveThruRPG.com as a PDF supplement. I'm changing the product list now. -Anonymous (p.s., I've also written a lot of poetry... yeah, bad joke, I know) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.163.0.38 (talk) 18:38, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Number of options in 2.0?

The number of possible combinations for Origins aren't infinite. Last night I counted 28 of one kind and 40 of the other kind, for a total of 28x40=1120 different Origins. Perhaps this should be included in the article? Ideally along with the number of Feats, the number of Feat categories, the number of base classes and the number of expert classes. I can count the last three if asked, but I refuse to count all the Feats. Actually another thing to enrich the article would be a complete list of the core classes, since such a list says much about the game's (breadth of) focus. --Peter Knutsen (talk) 07:36, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fantasy Craft

An update to the subsection on Fantasy Craft is needed, as the game is out. More pertinently, the game was released as a standalone and doesn't properly fit under the Spycraft heading, and as such it may be more appropriate to generate a new article for it. Sangrolu (talk) 11:54, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Update project

This article is rather dated; I am commencing an update project. My first step is primarily organizational. I'd eventually like to spawn Mastercraft and Fantasy Craft off into their own articles, but right now, I don't have the references to support those.

My tentative TODO list:

Re-organize existing sections.
Gather and add sources for Fantasy Craft and Mastercraft
Add further information on existing titles.
Add information on new titles as they become available (Spycraft 3.0, Ten Thousand Bullets)
Fork off new titles once they have sufficient info to stand on their own.

If you'd like to coordinate with me on the update, drop me a message here! - Sangrolu (talk) 13:49, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Spycraft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:24, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]