Talk:Springbank Island

	Australia portal Springbank Island is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canberra (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Islands Start‑class

	Islands portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Springbank Island versus Springbank Property

Except for the first paragraph, this article seems to be almost exclusively about the original Springbank Property that existed before Canberra. It contains none of the present day details of Springbank Island which is what I was looking for - ie area, flora and fauna, any buildings, access, useage etc. The two items are really not related except the name of the much larger original property gave its name to the later small man made island. I believe this article should be split into two articles - obviously with cross reference to each other. Tiddy (talk) 07:46, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could not agree more. This article needs much work. I've started by adding sections and cleaning up a little; but it's all focused on the property. It looks like a family member's personal history project. Rangasyd (talk) 04:37, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sections

This article badly needs more sections. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miraclewhipped224 (talk • contribs) 07:24, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Rangasyd (talk) 04:34, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]