Talk:Spring Education Group

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

COVID-19 Low‑importance

	COVID-19 portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject COVID-19, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all COVID-19-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to join and to participate in project discussions.COVID-19Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19Template:WikiProject COVID-19COVID-19
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

26th June undid Edits

Hi @amiago

Same edits were undone here too, so pasting the reply here too:

Thanks for the clarification. I now understand that NY Times is a valid source & NYPost isn't. However, additional sources may not be needed since the existing sources support the change intended:

1. FT (which is added a reference for those lines) has added the below lines to it's article at a later date to make it sound more neutral:

"Primavera Capital, the firm later founded by Fred Hu, has subsequently stated that he is not a member of the CCP or any other political party and was not a CCP member at the time when he was an executive at Goldman Sachs."

FT article link: https://www.ft.com/content/eac99fd9-0c30-4141-821a-45348f61c113

2. The other references added for the statement mention 'alleged' ties: The below statement in Guardian:

"DeSantis stripped four private schools of state scholarship money, alleging without evidence they had “direct ties to the Chinese Communist party”

Guardian article link: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/oct/02/ron-desantis-florida-private-schools-china-communist-party

Using the above mentioned existing reference(s), the sentence to be edited to one of the below options whichever you think is the best way to proceed:

OPTION 1: "In September 2023, Florida governor Ron DeSantis ended voucher programs for four Spring Education Group schools, citing concerns about ties to Primavera Capital Group. This was one of the measures against the Chinese Communist Party in the state of Florida. However, as per The Guardian the action taken against the four schools was without evidence."

OPTION 2: "n September 2023, Florida governor Ron DeSantis ended voucher programs for four Spring Education Group schools, citing concerns about ties to Primavera Capital Group, though as per Financial Times the firm denied having political connections with China's ruling party."

Please do let me know your comments. Thanks WorldPeace888 (talk) 02:47, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the quote ascribed to the FT article actually coming from? It doesn't appear in the article itself. - Amigao (talk) 11:56, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply @Amigao.

Seems the ver. of FT you are referencing is the achieved/old ver:

Old ver. link: https://archive.is/pIqRi

The newer ver. of the same story/news is where they have added the additional line after last the paragraph.

Last para being: "HSBC has separately established CCP committees in other entities it controls in China, such as within its asset management joint venture with Shanxi Trust."

New ver. link: https://www.ft.com/content/eac99fd9-0c30-4141-821a-45348f61c113 If needed will update the FT source on the page with the new ver. of the article's link.

WorldPeace888 (talk) 14:22, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]