Talk:Spray-on condom

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Reproductive medicine task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Spray-on condom appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 May 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the application of a spray-on condom was based on the logistics of a drive-through car wash?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/May.

Wikipedia

Question

Sorry in advance for the gross anatomical talk. But this is something the article left me wondering about, and I'm sure other people will wonder as well, so it should probably be addressed if you have any sources for it.

My question is (sorry), how do you ejaculate in this? Where does the semen go? Normal condoms have a reservoir. Honestly, it hurts just looking at this thing. Do any of the sources you've read address this? rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 01:57, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According to the institure website [ here (in German) and a crappy auto-translation;

"In our current prototype can spray the condom does not generate reservoir. However, we develop a procedure that it might be possible in a reservoir to generate Sprühvorgang^?. In this reservoir would be the sperm flow."

I therefore think that this invention is more of a 'prototype' than the article might suggest; I will attempt to rectify this balance with sources. Chzz ► 08:30, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just an addition to the translation: via wikt:sprühen (to spray) and wikt:vorgang (process), I would guess it might be something close to: "In our current prototype the spray does not generate reservoir for the condom. However, we are developing a procedure that might make it possible to generate a reservoir in the spraying process. The sperm would flow into this reservoir."

Advantage

Surely the advantages include not just usefulness for unusual sizes, but unusual shapes as well.--Filll (talk | wpc) 02:47, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Unusual shapes"... like.... helical? DS (talk) 19:03, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]