Talk:Spongiforma squarepantsii/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 20:53, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, this one caught my attention :) - I'll give it a read through now and add my review below. Miyagawa (talk) 20:53, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discovery and naming: Do we know Desjardin's first name? Also it seems weird to mention him in this way without explaining who he was first.

I've added his full name as well as those of the other authors. Sasata (talk) 04:08, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discovery and naming: I'd suggest adding a cite directly after "similarity with the cartoon character."

I disagree; this is sourced to the citation that's given in the following sentence. Sasata (talk) 04:08, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discovery and naming: Should this section be titled Taxonomy and classification?

Sure, changed. Sasata (talk) 04:08, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Description: "and has dimensions of" - would something along the lines of "usually measures" make the sentence flow better?

Agree, changed. Sasata (talk) 04:08, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Description: "vaguely fruity or strongly musty" - quote needs a cite.

Added. Sasata (talk) 04:08, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References: Cite 6 needs to have it's access date in the same format as the other dates.

I can't seem to see what's wrong with this, the template formatting is as it should be in all three cases, but it's not displaying the accessdate in two of them. Perhaps this has something to do with the recent rollout of 1.18? Sasata (talk) 04:08, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No reason to blame the software, I had simply missed filling in the url parameters! Thanks Stemonitis for fixing this for me. Sasata (talk) 14:17, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Images all check out.

Description is good - all unfamiliar terms have have been linked to their respective articles. That's all the issues I can see with this article. Miyagawa (talk) 21:21, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review Miyagawa. Sasata (talk) 04:08, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Great, I think this now all meets the criteria. Miyagawa (talk) 21:22, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]