Talk:Split-brain (computing)

Too much jargon. Biscuittin (talk) 21:19, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Forget the jargon, too many errors. History2007 (talk) 21:57, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Description is OK

I cleaned the article up to stress that this noxiously ugly! term regards inconsistent data in records distributed over many servers in any "server cluster". The previous text was not incorrect, it just mumbled in the beard, so that it was hard to correlate to how this noxiously ugly! term is really used. By Jove! Rursus dixit. (^mbork³!) 12:53, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with last sentence in the introduction.

The last sentence in the last paragraph in the introduction seems wrong. Here is the last paragraph of the introduction: "A shared storage may experience data corruption. If the data storages are kept separate data inconsistencies that might require operator intervention and cleanup."

I went all the way through the page history and this particular section was added as of 12:49, 9 May 2012. Exactly as it appears now.

Would a better wording be "If the data storages are kept separate, data inconsistencies that require operator intervention and cleanup might appear." ?

I would have made the edit myself but I am not sure I am correct given that I am no "computer scientist" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Black3agl353 (talk • contribs) 02:10, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]