Talk:Spiral Staircase

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved since it's unanimous. -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:40, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Spiral staircase → Spiral staircase (disambiguation) – The primary topic is clearly the architectural feature which is a key section of Stairs; even the links here indicate that. The other articles listed are films, etc., each with its own disambiguator in brackets. This move frees up Spiral staircase to act as a redirect to the main topic at Stairs#Spiral and helical stairs. Bermicourt (talk) 18:53, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Could possibly be its own page, too, but not now; I believe the nom in this case is spot-on. Red Slash 21:44, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Spiral Staircase (disambiguation). The ambiguous title is title-cased. -- JHunterJ (talk) 17:48, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I would be happy with that modification to the move. --Bermicourt (talk) 20:59, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support, with capitalization per JHunterJ. The clear primary topic of spiral staircase is a staircase that resembles a spiral. bd2412 T 02:01, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support to treat the architectural feature the primary topic of "spiral staircase". But what about "Spiral Staircase"? Is the architectural feature the primary topic of "Spiral Staircase"? I don't think it is and I think Spiral Staircase should keep pointing to the disambiguation page (note Spiral Staircase currently have two incoming links from the article namespace and neither of them are about the architectural feature). I propose moving this page to Spiral Staircase instead of having Spiral Staircase redirecting to Spiral Staircase (disambiguation) per WP:MDP. --Kusunose 02:59, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'd support that destination too. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:30, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't object to that solution. bd2412 T 14:02, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds reasonable to me too. --Bermicourt (talk) 14:28, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Red Slash 00:59, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.