Talk:Spinout (film)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elvis Presley, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Elvis PresleyWikipedia:WikiProject Elvis PresleyTemplate:WikiProject Elvis PresleyElvis Presley articles

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

California Holiday

The film was released under this title in the UK (and elsewhere in Europe?) Bhasi23 01:37, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:SpinoutElvis.jpg

Image:SpinoutElvis.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale updated. --Northmeister 13:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 19:47, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 20 December 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) Fuortu (talk) 17:46, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spinout (film) → Spinout – Undiscussed move: [1]. The Elvis Presley movie is more famous than anything else and surely more famous than the soundtrack album for it and its title song. Moscow Connection (talk) 15:34, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:25, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Moscow Connection: "spinout" has other meanings, see https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/spinout . Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:25, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- These other meanings don't have standalone articles on Wiki. The movie is by far the most famous of what's on Wikipedia, in my opinion.
  @Anthony Appleyard: By the way, about this. The disambiguation page was here already: "Spinout (disambiguation)". Another user performed a cut-and-paste move. --Moscow Connection (talk) 16:39, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It may have been undiscussed, but I actually think this is a good move, the album's pageviews are far ahead of the film's. Nohomersryan (talk) 16:50, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's simply because the album is linked from this whole template: Template: Elvis Presley. While the movie isn't for some reason. --Moscow Connection (talk) 16:53, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – no rationale for primarytopic status has been advanced; "by far the most famous of what's on Wikipedia, in my opinion" is not a thing. Dicklyon (talk) 16:56, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the primary meaning is Spinout (business), transfer by a parent company of shares in a subsidiary to the shareholders in the parent, the secondary meaning is Spinout (driving), failure/skid when braking. The film is not what even an Elvis fan would first think of. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:03, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We appear to have duplicate dabs at Spinout started 18 Dec, and Spinout (disambiguation) 11:23, 15 December 2016‎. The older of the two should be moved over the younger. It also now has more entries on it. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:16, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the new one at Spinout into a redirect to the old one at Spinout (disambiguation). I agree that the latter needs to move to the former. Dicklyon (talk) 05:05, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Okay, the current version of "Spinout (disambiguation)" (expanded by In ictu oculi) convinces me that the film is not the primary meaning and shouldn't be moved. --Moscow Connection (talk) 13:25, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Spinout (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070823091731/http://www.digitallyobsessed.com/index.php3 to http://www.digitallyobsessed.com/index.php3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:23, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]