Talk:Spinning into Butter
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Note
[edit]I just deleted a lot of stuff from this page. It looks like most of it was written for a high school assignment. It even cited a book for high school students on how to write about plays. There were sentences like "such and such a character serves a ultitarian role because she moves the dialog forward." Clearly, this kind of information is not appropriate for a Wikipedia article. In fact, there was a whole section on "Music," even though there is no music in the play.— Preceding unsigned comment added by H2DA (talk • contribs) 04:01, 3 February 2010
Requested move 16 December 2014
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 07:40, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Spinning Into Butter → Spinning into Butter – Per WP:NCCAPS, into is a word that does not need to be capitalized (although I'm not sure why is does, but let's save that for another discussion). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erpert (talk • contribs) 02:53, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support – per MOS:CT, make sense; and it's not unusual to find it lowercase in sources. And the cap version makes it look like "Into" is a kind of Butter, sort of like "Spinning Inuit Butter". Dicklyon (talk) 06:02, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support – per MOS:CT. —BarrelProof (talk) 06:07, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.