Talk:Spinnin' Records

List of Spinnin' Records sublabels was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 19 July 2020 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Spinnin' Records. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Spinnin' Premium was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 3 February 2018 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Spinnin' Records. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Source (record label) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 6 January 2017 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Spinnin' Records. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Spinnin' Records article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Record Labels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

YouTube Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject YouTube To-do:

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see list.
Assess : Apply the assessment scale on Unknown-importance YouTube articles + Unassessed YouTube articles
Cleanup : See cleanup listing
Maintain : This WikiProject
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class YouTube articles
Other :
- Substitute {{WikiProject YouTube/Invite Members}} on user talk pages
- Check out edit requests on Talk:List of YouTubers

February 2009

it is one of worlds biggest labels with many songs charted on top 40 in holland —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.57.187.80 (talk • contribs) 18:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, well, "no" on that first claim. Please provide sources for these rather bold statements, so that the article can be helped and deletion avoided. Drmies (talk) 03:16, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for expansion (February 2014)

– WikiRedactor (talk) 21:05, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 9 December 2014

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

50.79.148.5 (talk) 16:17, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: as you have not requested a change.
If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 16:59, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Genres

Please discuss genres here before attempting to add them or reverting. Thanks you. Karst (talk) 17:16, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sublabels

This is a WP:INVOLVED closure as a result of the consensus reached at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Spinnin' Records sublabels‎ to merge the content of that article here. Other known sublabels can be included on this list with the aid of any applicable source. (non-admin closure) Jalen Folf (talk) 23:13, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I have again removed a long list of non-notable sublabels. Most of them will never be important enough to get their own article. The repeated addition of the sublabels is, in my opinion, just promotional. I will keep removing this. The Banner talk 09:29, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why we couldn't write the sublabels list ? It could be interesting, I took a long time to write a part of the list !

LouisDlcr — Preceding unsigned comment added by LouisDlcr (talk • contribs) 17:09, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have to bring this back up: I too have tried removing a huge portion of the sub-labels from the article, only to be reverted twice by a single IP. The claim was that the list came direct from Spinnin Records' own website. If this is the case, then why isn't the related page sourced in prose? Jalen Folf (talk) 22:43, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Primary sources such as the label's own website can be useful for fleshing out facts but the main source of importance and weight comes from descriptions in WP:SECONDARY sources. If the sublabel is not described in secondary sources, then we must assume it's not very important. Unimportant stuff shouldn't be listed in the article. Binksternet (talk) 22:55, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Spinnin' Records. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:26, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Bjønr" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bjønr. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Jalen Folf (talk) 22:57, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Chachi (DJ)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chachi (DJ). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Jalen Folf (talk) 22:58, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"DJ Bl3nd" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect DJ Bl3nd. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Jalen Folf (talk) 01:53, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 25 June 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

the list of sublabels is grossly incomplete, and can and should be completed. soucing this should also be easy as spinnin' list all of their former and current sublabels directtly on their website (https://spinninrecords.com/releases) ARUKok (talk) 01:52, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 02:42, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Trap City (music group)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Trap City (music group). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 19#Trap City (music group) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:03, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Liquid Recordings" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Liquid Recordings. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 19#Liquid Recordings until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:03, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Oxygen (Record Label)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Oxygen (Record Label). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 19#Oxygen (Record Label) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:05, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Oxygen (record label)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Oxygen (record label). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 19#Oxygen (record label) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:05, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Oxygen Recordings" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Oxygen Recordings. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 19#Oxygen Recordings until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:06, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Artists rearrangements required.

The artists lineups seems a little untidy right there. Would like to suggest to do the rearrangements for these artists. Also need to informed about the artists whose leaving Spinnin Records for other labels as well. VernardoLau (talk) 15:07, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We include these artists anyway even if they left for another label. No need to remove them. Jalen Folf (talk) 15:27, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On this note, I am currently working on a standalone article for Spinnin' Records artists which should also include artists who released on its sub-labels as well. Sourcing will take a lot of time, though. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:53, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]