Talk:Spike (journalism)

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Unreferenced articles

This article was provided with references by an Unreferenced articles project volunteer on 19 April 2023. If you edit this page, please build on the good work by citing your sources.Unreferenced articlesWikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced articlesTemplate:WikiProject Unreferenced articlesUnreferenced articles articles

Reference for spike

I'm new; please gently correct errors.

I just got to this page from a link in Journalism ethics and standards. It seems like a useful term, unless it has been superseded by another term referring to the same process. I agree there is a paucity of results upon googling; however, the recent reference [1] from the Times Literary Supplement seems quite notable.

This article (Spike) is a stub and needs editing, but that's normal, am I correct? What I wonder is whether it is really only used for articles of questionable veracity, or if it is also used for articles that are withheld for other reasons, such as political or advertiser pressure, etc.

Now how do I get these comment into the conversation without doing something as drastic as deleting the banner recommending deletion? I'm not clear as to whether this is a routine action, or something that might start a brawl ;). Thanks, Postpostmod (talk) 18:43, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

After reading the banner again carefully, I decided I was invited to add the reference to the article and then delete the banner. So I did. If something is incorrect, please revert. Postpostmod (talk) 00:35, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ideology

The article should also mention spiking as a way to downplay challenges to ideology. Uncle Ed (talk) 14:56, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]