Talk:Sphere mapping

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer graphics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer graphics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer graphicsWikipedia:WikiProject Computer graphicsTemplate:WikiProject Computer graphicscomputer graphics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

not necessarilly incomplete

What about using equirectangular projection to store the full 360x180 view ? With that you can have mostly pixel perfect views in all directions, no? --TiagoTiago (talk) 17:51, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In Nov 2008 this article was tagged for merger into Reflection mapping. More than two years of discussion (on Talk:Reflection mapping#Merging comments) resulted in only four comments, all opposed to the proposed merger. I'm removing the mergeto template now. Jaho (talk) 20:20, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]