Talk:Spectro-temporal receptive field

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to the physiology of the brain, nerves and nervous system.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spatio- vs Spectro-

I believe there is a major error in this article. STRFs in the auditory system typically refer to spectrotemporal receptive fields, NOT spatiotemporal receptive fields, as the receptive field for a neuron responding to auditory stimuli would have an auditory frequency component along with its temporal component.

This is even mentioned in the figure, which is of a spectrotemporal RF. Sirshane13 03:15, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Sirshane. I only know spatiotemporal receptive fields in the context of the visual processing of apparent motion. These receptive fields are thought to perform a convolution of spatial and temporal input into spatiotemporal energy... . In principle however it might also be possible that spatiotemporal receptive fields exist in the auditory modality. However even if these should exist, the visual ones would have to be mentioned first, because the visual modality is definitively the most important source of motion perception. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.89.159.187 (talk) 23:00, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are both right. I have moved the page (many years later!). --mcld (talk) 22:48, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]