Talk:Specification and Description Language
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This article is based on material taken from the Free On-line Dictionary of Computing prior to 1 November 2008 and incorporated under the "relicensing" terms of the GFDL, version 1.3 or later. |
I have swapped the content of "Specification and Description Language" and "Specifciation and Design Language" MJ 19. 12. 2006 "Specifciation and Design Language" now redirects to "Specification and Description Language".
I think SDL refered at beginning to the term "Specifciation and Design Language", if this is the case, please make a note on the "Specification and Description Language" page. If that was not the case, the page "Specifciation and Design Language" should be removed.
SDL subpages
[edit]An unfortunite, yet never recognised, misusage of the Process agent reference was used by Hrudaya when adding the hierarchical references to this page. Changing it the way I did -I hope- will help to improve the content o WikiPedia... JanEnEm (talk) 21:42, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
"Some questions about SDL" blog note
[edit]I have written a blog note with title as above (http://www.teigfam.net/oyvind/home/technology/056-some-questions-about-sdl/) and wonder if it would be appropriate to include it in the "External links" section? It contains comments by one of the original SDL specialists. If it is not appropriate, then I (or you) should also remove this chapter, to avoid piggy-backing on Wikipedia. Øyvind Teig (talk) 10:25, 20 March 2013 (UTC)