Talk:Specially Designated Global Terrorist

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography: Terrorism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Copyright/plagiarism concerns.

I am concerned that this article too closely follows the original texts given, one of which was not given as a citation, though clearly it was the original.

Article "which President George W. Bush signed two weeks after the 9/11 attacks to obstruct terrorist funding) by the US of individuals, businesses, charities, and extremist groups engaged in terrorist activities"

Source "which President Bush signed two weeks after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks to obstruct terrorist funding. It authorizes the United States to identify individuals, businesses, charities and extremist groups engaged in terrorist activities."[1]

Article "to block the assets of individuals and entities that provide support, services, or assistance to, or otherwise associate with, terrorists and terrorist organizations designated under the Order, as well as their subsidiaries, front organizations, agents, and associates"

Source (which is not cite) "to block the assets of individuals and entities that provide support, services, or assistance to, or otherwise associate with, terrorists and terrorist organizations designated under the Order, as well as their subsidiaries, front organizations, agents, and associates." [2]

--Slp1 (talk) 23:24, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What would you change? That wouldn't change it from the statute? And is it plagiarism under applicable U.S. intellectual property/copyright law if it is in a U.S. statute, or is that a safe harbor from a plagiarism claim? Would you change the President's name, the number of weeks, the statutory language, phrase "order"?--Epeefleche (talk) 02:02, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Material produced by the US Govt is not subject to copyright. Legacypac (talk) 22:32, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete categorization

The treasury department now maintains a list, SPECIALLY DESIGNATED NATIONALS AND BLOCKED PERSONS, that has (apparently) replaced the 'Specially Designated Global Terrorist' list. Attempt to go to the preceding list, using the link on the Article page, and you will find it does not any longer exist.Haberstr (talk) 20:21, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IDF

At the end of the basic list of organizations/entities categorized as terror orgs, the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) was inserted randomly & crudely. The IDF is not a terrorist organization nor designated as such.

I reckon it was done with misguided or and dissimulated impulse.

Let this be a tiny – yet consequential – proof that Wikipedia will have to be curated of inserted (momentous backwash) misinformation, disinformation, and textual parsing that are demonstrably counter-productive to fact & truth; confirmed & established as such accordingly to up-to-date events, clauses, and specifications.

In regards to current events, why they are the way they are, bear the intergenerational clash (clash between generations in understanding the world) of a hard slog that's been compounded for decades and recent century at the very least, which cannot be contested by random impulses. Such establishments & institutions have their own ergonomics that have been meticulously exigent and exhaustively exact for such a long time now that, any ad-hoc moxie crammed disapproval influenced by obscure outlets – or by the mere lack of proficient knowledge – self-denunciates for obnoxious obscurity at best, pathological dissimulation & malevolence at worst.

Be better with yourself, understand the historicity that establishments & institutions maintain to these kinetic clashes in the world and, most importantly, understand why positive values are resilient to any attempts of evil submissions & underminings (eg. liberty & freedom of consequence to one's own being & avoiding consequence to others' being based on liberty is a demonstrable platform of unabated positive value; whereas false perception of liberty imposed is doing harm to yourself or and to others simply because you think that's liberty – the harm in the self-delusion of benefiting from that harm, in imperceptible ways you can fail to recognize them as such because of the ill-fated veil & inertia). When pathological operatives & actors take advantage of those positive values, twisting to lie, harm, and destroy, only to then gather support because of their direct & indirect coercive ways, then people who put liberty on a pedestal are innately legitimized to counter those pathological operatives & actors, and their willful supporters with such malleable conscious & lack of deterrence to evil. 86.120.215.223 (talk) 10:51, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]