Talk:Special economic zone/Archives/2013

Coastal cities and Pudong

The 14 coastal cities and the Pudong New Zone are not SEZs. -- 09:44, January 31 2005, UTC

Added More and streamlined the rest

Firstly I created about a new article about SEZs in China and then deflecting the bit about in SEZs in China to that main article. This allowed me restrict the infomation on this page to only infomation on SEZs in general and retaining all infomation on SEZs in the PRC. Also added few other countries to list --- which are known to have SEZs, namely Jordan and Poland. Also added infomation about SEZs in India and added External links.

What I would like to see in this article is more about SEZs all around the world.In1.154.97|202.141.154.97]] 05:17, 6 July 2006 (UTC)SANDEEEP

Brazil

-In Brazil there are no special economic zones contrary to the article specifically talking about special economic zones, please revise! best wishes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.4.232.164 (talk) 01:21, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Isn't there one for PDRK? North Korea?

I remember hearing that North Korea has an Special Economic Zone around Najin area. Any info?

Shepardsbush (talk) 08:06, 4 February 2008 (UTC)shepardsbush ===

I believe the SEZ you are referring to in the DPRK is the Gaesong complex. There are number of South Korean and foreign invested concerns currently operating there. Much to the chagrin of the United States..

Unfortunately, I haven't found out if there are incentives for investing there beyond the lower labour costs. It's a good guess that there are as the whole point to an SEZ is to attract business. It wouldn't make much sense to organize and build an sez and not offer incentives when all others do offer incentives. Hope this helps...

sorry an update you are indeed correct nanjin area bordering with china so there are actually two the one I mentioned Gaesong which is near the DMZ and the other bordering on the chinese border it is called Rajin-Sonbong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.85.255.168 (talk) 15:27, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Seperate Page for India needed

this article has been flooded with information about Indian SEZs. That information should constitute another article. Information on Indian SEZs should only be mentioned (if not summarized), like the information relating to SEZs in other countries Kashyap3 16:12, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

• India is trying to copy China in developing Special Economic Zones. They should have their own section, as should China. India has converted most of their Export Processing Zones to SEZs. 161.253.38.33 02:05, 12 November 2007 (UTC)XXinfinity

Really, Separate page for Indian SEZ is required. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.68.120.18 (talk) 05:18, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

I also agree,a separate article is required for SEZs of India since there is a lot of information that can be added to it.Mayur.ninama (talk) 19:52, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

I support too. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 13:53, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

i support too...since a lot of talk and issues having been going in development of SEZs in farmlands...it requires deeper depth of coverage — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.242.118.249 (talk) 04:37, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Special Economic Zones is a separate term

The description of SEZs as an "overarching" term for other "zones" is false. A special economic zone is treated as a foreign territory in terms of policy and regulations. If SEZs were an overarching term then you wouldn't be able to say that export processing zones in India were converted to SEZs. SEZs should be treated as their own phenomena. 161.253.38.33 02:05, 12 November 2007 (UTC)XXinfinity

Special Economic Zones, Free Trade Zone, Economic PRocessing Zones etc.. are based on the similar exemptions provided by the governmewnts hence should be dealt with at the same place. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.227.50.74 (talk) 06:06, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Special economic zone. Favonian (talk) 18:51, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

---

Special Economic Zone → Special economic zones –

There are lots of these in many countries, as pointed out in the article. Per WP:MOSCAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles. Tony (talk) 09:45, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

• Support per WP:MOSCAPS In ictu oculi (talk) 12:55, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
• Support. Julie Parson's Illustrated Dictionary of Economics lower cases this one. Kauffner (talk) 14:57, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
• Comment the MOS also avoid plurals in titles, so drop the final s. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.