Talk:Spearhead Land Element

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

United Kingdom

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 05:58, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Spearhead Land Element → Spearhead Lead Element – The article refers to "Spearhead Lead Element", as do the citations. I've no idea why this is currently at "Spearhead Land Element" Bondegezou (talk) 12:52, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - check the citations again. The Hansard reports and the MOD webpage refer to it as Spearhead Land Element. – ukexpat (talk) 18:58, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I have corrected the lead accordingly. – ukexpat (talk) 18:59, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Confusing... Apologies for my earlier error, but I offer the following citations using the "Spearhead Lead Element" terminology: http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/DefenceNews/MilitaryOperations/PrimeMinisterPraisesMilitaryEffortInLibyanEvacuations.htm , http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1558009/Britain-almost-out-of-troops-memo-reveals.html , http://www.heraldscotland.com/mobile/news/home-news/just-days-after-britain-cuts-billions-from-its-armed-forces-budget-how-black-watch-is-poised-to-rescue-refugees-fleeing-terror-in-libya-1.1088812 , http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8692178/London-riots-spread-to-Midlands-and-north-west-on-fourth-night-of-trouble.html , http://politiken.dk/udland/ECE1357321/militaer-eliteenhed-klar-til-indsats-mod-optoejer/ , http://fr.novopress.info/94076/royaume-uni-larmee-mise-en-alerte/ Has the name been changed? Are these two different things? Bondegezou (talk) 13:21, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - I have asked the MilHist folks to chime in. – ukexpat (talk) 14:46, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can't offer sources but my usual experience would be to refer to it in documentation as the Spearhead Lead Element, at least it was each time I had dealings with it.

It's a PJHQ force element so whilst the main group is around an Inf unit there are frequently Air Farce elements and sometimesNavy. It can also be formed around a Commando, which is a Fleet rather than Land asset.

ALR (talk) 19:46, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Spearhead Lead Element as per ALR. Buckshot06 (talk) 01:25, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose. Both titles appear to be in use in sources, so either could potentially be valid. There seems to be a slight preference for "Spearhead Land Element" in a Google Books search though, so I'd say keep the article at its current stable title "Spearhead Land Element", but setup a redirect from the other term, and include it in the lead. --El on ka 00:09, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Readiness

I'm inclined to remove the whole "readiness" section as most of it isn't related to Spearhead, but is part of the routine business of running the unit. Everyone has to maintain Next of Kin, Passports and innoculations as a matter of course. Unit and sub-unit training takes place and it's always scrutinised for appropriateness and usefulness.

I'm not convinced that it says anyhting that pertains to this subject.

ALR (talk) 09:38, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Naming nonsense

I have to concede that I'm somewhat perplexed that the MoD website can refer to both the Sperhead Lead Element and the Spearhead Land Element in different articles. That said I've written material for the MoD website and been hesitant to put my name to it after the web editor had butchered it.

We're now stuck in a situation with the article under the incorrect name, so having to make linguistic twists to explain it. So how do we proceed? Do we just use the correct term anyway or do we imply that the correct term is wrong and the incorrect term is correct?

ALR (talk) 21:02, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]