Talk:Speakers' Corner, Singapore/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 12:40, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give reviewing this a shot, should have it up soon. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 12:40, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Almost forgot about this, here are the issues I found:

National Solidarity Party links to a disambiguation page; have it link to the right article.
- Fixed by Kaypoh. — SMUconlaw (talk) 13:48, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"of the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore[2]" period after Singapore
- Fixed by Kaypoh. — SMUconlaw (talk) 13:48, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"(Registration with the police is no longer required.)" This is already noted in the lead and feels out of plate so early in the article. Move it to a later mention (it's in the next section anyway), or just remove the sentence since the parentheses bring the flow to a halt.
- Fixed by Kaypoh. — SMUconlaw (talk) 13:48, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"On the same day, the Public Order (Unrestricted Area) Order 2009 " So is it called the Public Order Order? That's a bit confusing, and the addition of various ways to say the bills actually makes it harder to follow; try simplifying them a bit if you can.
- Comment: Yes, that's the name of the legislation. It is a piece of subsidiary legislation made under the Public Order Act, so that's why it begins with "Public Order ...". Furthermore, it is a species of subsidiary legislation called an "order", so that's why it ends with "Order" as well. In the interest of accuracy, I don't think there is a simpler way to refer to it. — SMUconlaw (talk) 13:48, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There's a citation needed tag that needs to be remedied.
- Fixed: removed the sentence, as I don't think a citation can be found for it. — SMUconlaw (talk) 13:48, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"However, several unofficial sites have sprung up to fill this void." examples/citation?
- Fixed by Kaypoh (the sentence has been removed). — SMUconlaw (talk) 13:48, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There's not too much to fix. I'll put the article on hold for five days and will pass it when the issues are fixed. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 16:28, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kaypoh fixed most of the issues before I had a look at it a while ago. Anyway, it looks like all the issues have been dealt with. — SMUconlaw (talk) 13:48, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Everything looks good now, so I'll pass the article. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 23:37, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]