Talk:Sparkler

Sparkler Controversy

This article would benefit from the description of recent trends (including lots of youtube videos) dealing with people binding hundreds of sparklers and using them to create "Sparkler Bombs" that have a dangerously powerful explosion. Many arrests, news reports and other things have happened as a result of this phenomenon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.218.97.104 (talk) 03:50, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Give a single source of sparklers being explosive and it could be considered. BP OMowe (talk) 19:07, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sparklers in other countries

This article would benefit from mention of how sparklers are used in nations other than the US, for instance the Japanese "upside down" sparklers. Kouban 18:21, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Standard Fireworks

This article (Sparklers) redirects from a search for "Standard Fireworks." Standard Fireworks really should have their own entry. They were the leading British firework brand for many years, based in Huddersfield, and one of the first brands to introduce Chinese imports to Britain. The name still exists, although they are now owned by Black Cat fireworks of China. Anyway, they really should have their own entry, not just a redirection to sparklers!Wizlop 21:55, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By Definition?

Nowhere in definitions of the word firework do dictionaries say that it must be a ground launched projectile. This opening paragraph is missleading. Sparklers are a hand-held firework. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.253.187.20 (talk) 01:36, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, I'll edit it now, can anyone who disagrees find some sort of official deffinition that claims otherwise. Will Bradshaw (talk) 19:49, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sparkler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070227002952/http://www.monochrom.at:80/free-bariumnitrate/ to http://www.monochrom.at/free-bariumnitrate/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:25, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"traditional" . . .

from where & when? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.148.106.242 (talk) 15:43, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]