This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CooperativesWikipedia:WikiProject CooperativesTemplate:WikiProject CooperativesCooperatives articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Sparebank → Savings banks in Norway – Just as we have Architecture of Italy and not Architettura, I don't see any reason to have an article on Norwegian savings banks listed under the Norwegian word for "savings bank". The article doesn't even use the term after the second sentence, other than in one name that includes it, it refers consistently to "savings banks". Instead of moving it myself, I've treated this as a potentially controversial for one reason: the first sentence suggests that this may be a particular kind of savings bank that exists in Norway distinct from other savings banks that also exist there. But as the remainder of the article addresses "savings banks", it appears to be about all of them, not just a subset of them, hence this proposal. Still, because of that small doubt that the first sentence created for me, I'm posting this move proposal for input from others. Largoplazo (talk) 09:58, 5 October 2023 (UTC) — Relisting.ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 14:45, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It isn't a matter of mapping, it just means that all savings banks in Norway are mutual savings banks. (Mutual savings banks and savings banks aren't mutually exclusive, the former is a subset of the latter.) Anyway, if your argument were to prevail, then the outcome would be to move this article to Mutual savings banks in Norway, not to leave it under the Norwegian word. Largoplazo (talk) 18:24, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The text of those articles doesn't contradict it, and the ordinary meaning of "mutual" in front of the name of a type of financial institution X is "an X that's owned by its customers". A mutual insurance company, for example, is an insurance company owned by its policyholders. And I draw your attention again to the following facts:
The very first sentence of this article is "Sparebank is a Norwegian savings bank without external owners." So, it's a savings bank. A savings bank without external owners which, as I said above, is what "mutual savings bank" means, but, yes, a savings bank.
After the second sentence this article refers to its own subject exclusively as "savings banks". Each such reference further reenforces the conclusion that they are savings banks.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.