Talk:Spacecraft cemetery

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 3 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ginnybarnes, Jelly rxz, Charlessmolen.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate Name

This region has also been referred to in press reports as the "South Pacific Ocean Uninhabited Area" or SPOUA (notably this 2015 article on Gizmodo.com: http://gizmodo.com/this-watery-graveyard-holds-161-sunken-spaceships-1703212211 ), and by European Space Agency debris specialist Holger Krag in an audio interview in 2013 ( http://blogs.esa.int/atv/2013/10/30/making-sure-atv-reentry-is-safe/ ). Suggest adding the alternate name to the article, or adding a redirect if it can be documented that South Pacific Ocean Uninhabited Area is in official widespread use by the world's space agencies to refer to this area of Earth. LaoKtn (talk) 14:10, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blog reference

Really? A blogspot reference for the Progress spacecraft ditching? If there's no objection I'll remove the reference. 203.94.174.142 (talk) 05:14, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Spacecraft cemetery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130801203442/http://www.spaceflight101.com/progress-m-18m.html to http://www.spaceflight101.com/progress-m-18m.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:33, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Upsweep - coincidence?

Is there a reason Upsweep seems to be perfectly lined up with this graveyard? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.229.219.2 (talk) 02:49, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How much debris is hitting the surface?

It's unclear how much debris is reaching surface rather than burning up during reentry. How about some clarification about that?Arctic Gazelle (talk) 16:44, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's unlikely that anyone knows: it's in the middle of nowhere, after all. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 18:09, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]