Talk:Space logistics

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 March 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 December 2010 (UTC) result = nomination withdrawn. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on 31 July 2008. Further details are available here.

213.22.243.143 (talk) 20:50, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Would this article merit inclusion here[[1]] as it is written? I believe it would; if, it were broader in scope and less time specific. I do believe that it is somewhat self serving as these examples show:

"Retirement of the Shuttle while ISS operations are still being conducted results in reduced capability to supply ISS logistics requirements. An examination of existing and planned logistics carriers shows that there are deficiencies in both capacity and capability to support ISS needs."
"Sustainable space exploration is impossible without appropriate supply chain management ..........."
"Further, no evidence suggests that any of these cargo transport systems can increase production and launch rates to cover the cargo delivery deficiency."

and promotional in nature, though what is being promoted is unclear.Warrior777 18:15, 22 December 2010 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warrior777 (talk • contribs)

copyvio issue

The text reproduces at least some of the following announcement: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-135216712.html Yakushima (talk) 08:16, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blockquoted the whole thing, for now. Yakushima (talk) 08:59, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it turns out almost the entire article is copyright violation of this: [2] Yakushima (talk) 09:28, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note that it couldn't be a case of reverse copyvio, because the paper was published before the problematic edits: [3] and [4]. I have now identified and cited all plagiarized sections (I think/hope/dream ....) Yakushima (talk) 13:22, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting organized

This article really needs a major overhaul.

I have written to one of the co-authors of one of the more egregiously copyvio'ed sources, and to some members of the MIT Space Logistics group for help in coordinating improvements to this article. I'm not a logistics expert, I only dabbled in defense logistics software for about a year and half, so I'm hoping others take the lead technically while I help out with educating them where necessary about editing Wikipedia. Yakushima (talk) 06:22, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello -- I'm a member of the MIT Space Logistics Project and the AIAA Space Logistics Technical Committee. We have initiated a revision process, and although many of us are new to Wikipedia, hopefully we will be able to vastly improve the space logistics page in the next few months. --Ptgrogan (talk) 05:23, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Space logistics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:01, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]