Talk:Space Stories

Space Stories has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 9, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copyright renewed

For future reference, copyright was renewed on all issues, so none of the covers are public domain. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 03:02, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Space Stories/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: J Milburn (talk · contribs) 12:51, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to offer a review. J Milburn (talk) 12:51, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Standard Publications or Sam Merwin worth redlinking?
Both done. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:16, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've moved the cover to the lead, but now see that you may have made a deliberate choice not to put it in the lead. It does seem that the cover may be justified, but the rationale could use some tightening; also, perhaps you could tie the caption to the text. Alternatively (or additionally) we could try to get a PD logo? (Bergey's covers will enter the PD in 2023- one of the diaries, maybe!)
I've expanded the caption and the rationale; how does that look? I don't think we need the logo if we can keep the cover. Re Bergey, is that because it will be 70 years since his death? That would be great; there are quite a few of his covers that could be used on these articles. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:16, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Do you literally mean "paint" for the cover art?
Yes, they would have been pointed. Is there an issue there that I'm not seeing? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:16, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"though few of the stories were memorable;[4][5] The best-known" Is that capital a mistake, or were you intending to do something else?
Fixed. Looks like I went on a semicolon hunt and didn't completely kill that one. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:16, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Details on later publication of The Big Jump/any other stories contained?
I generally avoid mentioning later publications of the stories mentioned in these magazines unless there is something truly notable, such as winning a major award. I'll look through Bousfield's article again and see if I can find more stories worth mentioning. She tends to cover absolutely everything, which makes it hard to select for notability, but there's probably something I can pick out. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:16, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Now done. I don't think either author is worth linking -- both had just a handful of stories published and are not covered by the usual references. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 13:24, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"Bergey's cover, for the December 1952 issue, was the last cover he had painted for Standard before he died earlier that year.[4]" Very strange tense- could this be simplified?
Done. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:16, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Generally solid, as ever, but I've done slightly more copyediting than I would usually; please double-check. Google Scholar's throwing up only false-positives, so I suspect that the basic details you've included are most of what there is to say. J Milburn (talk) 13:13, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy that this is now ready for GA. Concerning the covers, see {{PD-old-70}}, but remember that they become PD on the 1 January 70 years after the 1 January on the year after the author died. (IANAL- any knowledge of copyright I have comes from Wikipedia/Commons!) J Milburn (talk) 17:53, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]