Talk:SpaceX CRS-10

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SpaceX CRS-10 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Spaceflight: Space stations Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the space stations working group.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Explosion

Did the explosion delay this flight? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.220.94.239 (talk) 18:03, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is the new launch date posted on spaceflightnow.com valid info for main article ?

I thought about adding the below information to the main article but had some doubts... If anyone here thinks it is valid, please can you write it in ? thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul Wi11iams (talk • contribs) 16:42, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On the third of november 2016, the serious and reliable spaceflightnow.com [[ https://spaceflightnow.com/launch-schedule/%7Cposted a new launch date for CRS-10]]

Nov. 3: Adding date for ... Falcon 9/SpaceX CRS 10; Adding timeframe for Falcon 9/SES 10...

with detailes as follows:

Jan. 22Falcon 9 • SpaceX CRS 10 Launch window: TBD
Launch site: SLC-40, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida... Delayed from Feb. 13, June 10 and Aug. 1. Moved up from Nov. 21. Delayed from Nov. 11. [Nov. 3]

Is this good enough to specifiy the 22 January date in the main article ?

If so, why is this "possible return to flight date" not a major media topic ?

--Paul Williams (talk) 12:36, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]