Talk:SpaceDev

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Spaceflight Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Growth

With the current and seemingly increasing amount of funds devoted to space by both NASA, DoD and private enterprise (Virgin Galactic, for example), it would seem that Spacedev is in a good position to capitalize on its engineering expertise and SpaceShipOne engine developmental experience. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.47.109.172 (talk • contribs) .

COTS

Need an update for SpaceDev losing the NASA COTS proposal. Some, myself included thought they had a good chance to be one of the two winners (SpaceX and Rocketplane-Kistler). Still, they have a pretty robust set of contracts, albeit mostly low dollar value. —Taka2007 05:19, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated the article to reflect that it was not a Phase 1 winner, but it would be nice if someone could find an external reference that explicitly states that its proposal was rejected and some of the reasons for it. -- Bovineone 19:38, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article Links to Non-Existent Pages

Perhaps the non-authored pages should be created or the wiki links removed. There are several. Spinlock55 (talk) 23:52, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on SpaceDev. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080303015107/http://chips.ssl.berkeley.edu/ to http://chips.ssl.berkeley.edu/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:41, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]