Jump to content

Talk:Soviet destroyer Sposobny (1970)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Soviet destroyer Sposobny (1970)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: L293D (talk · contribs) 23:56, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. L293D ( • ) 23:56, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

[edit]
  • File:BPK61Strogiy1985.jpg is in Russian and looks out of place on the en.wiki article. I don't know if you speak Russian, but maybe you could take File:Strogiy.jpg and redo the notations in English.
  • Working on it.

Source review

[edit]
  • All sources look reliable, though of course I can't check even the online ones.

Lead

[edit]
  • The ship served during the Cold War from 1971. - This sentence is a bit short, could you add when it stopped serving in the Russian navy? This would read like "The ship served during the Cold War from 1971 to 1995"
  • Added end date.
  • They were the first class designed to survive a nuclear explosion - Were they the first class of ships in the world designed to survive a nuke? Or the first in Russia?
  • Clarified
  • Link relevant article for the fall of the Soviet Union.
  • Done

Construction and Service

[edit]
  • Link relevant article for the fall of the Soviet Union.
  • Done.

GA Progress

[edit]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.