Talk:Soviet destroyer Serdity (1940)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 01:33, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria) (see here for this contributor's history of GA reviews)

It is reasonably well written:
Pass A few quibbles:
- "after receiving a message that a German convoy had been spotted." -- Any idea of where that convoy was or how far away?

- "Postwar, the wreck was raised in pieces and towed to Tallinn for scrapping between 1949 and 1952.[6]" -- does this mean it was towed from 1949 to 1952 or scrapped from 1949 to 1952, or both?

- Dab links and external links show no problem. Fixed one dup link and no others are problems. Copyvio tool shows green.
It is factually accurate and verifiable:
Pass Offline sources accepted in good faith. A cursory check of the source material on Google in English sources backs up material cites in the article.
It is broad in its coverage:
Pass Appropriate context included from ship class article; additional detail really only has a place there for consistency.
- Would prefer to have a unit cost, but records on this subject aren't common in the source material as I understand it.
It follows the neutral point of view policy:
Pass Healthy mix of book sources, in both Russian language and English text. No over-reliance on any one historian or source material.
It is stable:
Pass No problems there.
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
Pass One image included under public domain tag where appropriate.
Other:
Pass A few smaller details that could be clarified, but overall not by themselves enough to place the article on hold. So, passing for GA with comments noted above. Well done. —Ed!^(talk) 05:10, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]