Talk:Soviet destroyer Baku

Soviet destroyer Baku has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 14, 2018. (Reviewed version).

Soviet Union Low‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / Russian & Soviet / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	World War II task force

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Soviet destroyer Baku/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 09:28, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A few comments from me:

worth mentioning that the Vauquelin class were commissioned in the early 1930s

Done

the wartime crews don't match between the body and infobox
- Good catch.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:33, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I assume the primary mounts were in gunshields?
- Added--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:33, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
how were the depth charges launched prior to the installation of the launchers? Rails?
- Hill says "racks", but I'm not sure what exactly he means by that.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:33, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"but was renamed and then"?

Corrected. This was left over from before I expanded the section.

was the initial full name Sergo Ordzhonikidze? This is a bit confusing, as it is later said that she was renamed Sergo Ordzhonikidze?

No, it was simply Ordzhonikidze and then renamed to include his first name, probably because at the time Vladikavkaz was called Ordzhonikidze as well. I have also corrected the infobox. Kges1901 (talk) 10:17, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

perhaps link Flotilla leader is that is what she was?

Done. Kges1901 (talk) 10:17, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"to the former" it might be worth clarifying that this was the Northern Fleet

Done, Kges1901 (talk) 10:17, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"although Razyaryonny's propeller"

Done. Good catch. Kges1901 (talk) 10:17, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

more to come Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:28, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I assume Whitley does not have anything unique to say about her?

This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, contains no plagiarism, and is illustrated by an appropriately licensed image with an appropriate caption. Passing. Nice work! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:05, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]