Talk:Southwest Airlines Flight 1455

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Accidents Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

Start

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the Aviation accident project.

California: Los Angeles Mid‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force.

This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-06-14. The result of the discussion was Keep (nomination withdrawn).

Text copied from a published document

The article seems well-written and for the most part well-sourced. In my view it is too bad that the tag saying that "contains text from public domain source" is needed, to reveal that text is copied from the Accident Report source. It impugns the writing done throughout the article wikipedia editors, because it suggests any/all text was just copied. Can't the specific material from the one source be identified and put in proper quotes, then remove that tag, instead? Just because the source may be in the public domain does not mean that proper referencing is not needed. doncram (talk) 17:23, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Previous speed assignment cancelled automatically

The article reads:

According to the Aeronautical Information Manual, Section 4-4-11, this approach clearance automatically canceled any previous speed assignments.

Strangely, my copy of the FAR/AIM (2010) has no mention of this automatic speed-assignment-cancelling in section 4-4-11. Was this moved to a different section? Perhaps 4-4-10? - Eric (talk) 16:43, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it is mentioned in AIM Section 4-4-12f of the FAA online version 02-14-2008 incl. Changes 1-3.

I changed the chapter number and added that link to the article. --WideBlueSky (talk) 04:05, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That is one of those bits of knowledge that all pilots and controllers know, even if they haven't ever read it in any manual. Only the pilot knows what speed is safe for the approach, on his particular aircraft, size, weight, wind, weather, etc. all considered. Sometimes controllers will add something like "maintain 200 until the marker, cleared for the approach." That happens not too often, but when it does the pilot is supposed to tell the controller that he is unable, and to follow SOP which requires flaps, slats, and gear to be deployed no later than the OM. If the controller insists upon the plane remaining too high and/or too fast, until it is too close to the runway to make a final approach in a safe and legal manner, then the pilot has to go-around. That is mandatory. But the Captain in this accident decided to try and make it anyway. That is not just negligence; it amounts to willful misconduct in the cockpit and is why it was necessary to fire at least the Captain, if not the FO too. Apparently, the Company felt the FO also failed in his duties too, so both got fired. EditorASC (talk) 10:12, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

photo of the aircraft in topic

i happened to find a picture of the aircraft after the crash. Here is the link "http://www.airliners.net/photo/Southwest-Airlines/Boeing-737-3T5/0224315/L/" If it isn't violating any piracy laws, it would be much appreciated if the picture is added. I'm a newbie so dont know how to upload pictures on wikipedia articles. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.62.25.71 (talk) 09:42, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Southwest Airlines Flight 1455. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070930163616/http://www.ntsb.gov/recs/letters/2001/A01_49_70.pdf to http://www.ntsb.gov/recs/letters/2001/A01_49_70.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:01, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Southwest Airlines Flight 1455. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090712031134/http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/ATpubs/AIM/ to http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/ATpubs/AIM/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:06, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actual aircraft for infobox

I found the actual aircraft involved here: https://aviation-safety.net/photos/displayphoto.php?id=20000305-0&vnr=1&kind=PC Could we use it with permission? OrbitalEnd48401 (talk) 11:10, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]