Talk:Southampton town walls/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 00:24, 1 December 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   This is awkward: , and potentially it may have been defended by a bank of earth as well Bishop of Winchester should be capitalized. I think that there's a verb missing here Stone from the Isle of Wight. Something extra here: and is remains three storeys high

• Done. Hchc2009 (talk) 08:49, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

1. B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Link to the town's name in the lede. Specify which Richard for quick reference. Where are the Arcades? (The bulk of the west walls?) Is it Cathcold Tower or Catchcold Tower? And do we know how it got its name.

• Should all be done - cheers! Hchc2009 (talk) 08:49, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

1. B. Focused:

2. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

3. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

4. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

5. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: