Talk:South Region, Brazil

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Geography of Brazil task force (assessed as High-importance).

HDI

How can its HDI be right if all states comprising it have bigger values?

Region -> .875

RS -> .872

SC -> .921

PR -> .913

RS doesn't. Have you checked to see if the RS population vastly outnumbers that of other states? Besides, there might be inaccuracies,maybe they were calculated or researched at different times or something, but it's still very much possible that you're right. - Bjørnar, June 2013 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:C440:20:1116:640C:C042:8CC7:41E7 (talk) 12:18, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And what about Ukrainians?

There is no reference about the all-Ukrainian cities in Paraná and Santa Catarina! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.40.94.220 (talk) 03:43, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

and you could win $1 if you say whats brazils culture —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.227.66.203 (talk) 03:46, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Languages

This part of the article is nonsense:

"and there is fluency of the Spanish language in the population by the proximity to Spanish-speaking countries of Uruguay and Argentina.[citation needed]"

There is no fluency in Spanish in South of Brazil. First, only parts of the South region are close to Paraguay, Uruguay and Argentina. Second, what happens is that brazilian, as any portuguese speaker, can undertand spanish more or less (the contrary is not true, spanish speakers don;t understand spoken portuguese in general) but there's no fluency in Spanish at all.

I'm taking this part out of the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.236.84.43 (talk) 13:04, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question :Is this racist?

Skin color/Race (2008)[10]

White (European, Caucasian) 78.65%

Brown (Multiracial) 16.98% <-------------

Black (African) 3.50%

Yellow (Asian) 0.49% <----------

Red (Amerindian) 0.31% <------------

Undeclared 0.06% — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.146.247.190 (talk) 14:11, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Belated answer: not necessarily. That said, it doesn't reflect the source (which uses yellow, brown and black, but not red. Bromley86 (talk) 07:10, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Independence movement?

I heard in places that an independence movement exists or existed in South Brazil. Other articles for different regions (Basque nationalism, Scottish nationlism, etc.) exist, should there not be a mention or a link to an article about this? 73.11.81.111 (talk) 06:23, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As a southerner, I wanted to inform you that the southern independence movement is more of a joke, no one here takes it seriously, unlike Catalonia, the Basque Country, etc. 177.34.72.224 (talk) 09:50, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on South Region, Brazil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:15, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

South Region, Brazil (Köppen).svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:39, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]