Talk:South Queensland Crushers

Rugby league Mid‑importance

	South Queensland Crushers is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby league, which aims to improve the quality and coverage of rugby league football related articles. Join us!Rugby leagueWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby leagueTemplate:WikiProject Rugby leaguerugby league articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Queensland / Rugby league C‑class Low‑importance

	Australia portal South Queensland Crushers is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rugby league (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Anti-NSWRL slant

I have made some edits as the overall tone of this article gave rise to Brisbane Broncos fans' conspiracy theories that the Crushers were established in order to weaken or hold back the Broncos, stemming from an incorrectly assumed NSWRL bias against the Broncos. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.100.80.10 (talk) 15:33, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe there are incorrect facts as to why the Crushers were established by the NSWRL. You can't state that the NSWRL were trying to 'hold back' the Broncos by establishing a second team in Brisbane. This was never an official reason to start the team. Brisbane has the population, stadia, supporter base and junior development areas to support more than 1 team. You can't state it as fact that they were brought in to hold the Broncos back - you can state that some allege this is the reason. The team wasn't 'hastily' developed either - the allowed them entry for 1995 in November 1992. That is the same time given to most new licenses, including the Broncos, and more recently the Gold Coast Titans. I think the language of the article needs to be far more neutral as to the reasons why the Crushers were established. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.100.80.10 (talk) 15:51, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on South Queensland Crushers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050829062450/http://users.hunterlink.net.au:80/~maajjs/aus/clb/defunct.htm to http://users.hunterlink.net.au/~maajjs/aus/clb/defunct.htm#South%20Queensland

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:00, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]