Talk:South Padre Island, Texas

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Appropriate external links

Somebody -I'm guessing and administrator- has put upo a sign to prohibit the formation of more external links emanating from the South Padre Island, Texas article.

I suggest that several links be formed in order to further complete this article. Most of them are official representatives of the city (commerce, tourism, etc.)

Complying to the notice set in the article, I first mention the links in this discussion page, so a Wikipedia administrator reviews them and may agree to let them be formed on the article itself.

They are:
South Padre Island Travel
South Padre Island Chamber of Commerce
Town of South Padre Island
South Padre Island Spring Break
My Padre
South Padre International Music Festival
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Southpadreisland (talk • contribs) 22:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you.

--Valdezlopez 04:43, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would say the first three would be appropriate external links for this article. The last three would be inappropriate according to WP:EL. Postoak 05:16, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My opinion is the same as Postoak's on this one. Also please note that the question is also posted to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Texas#South Padre Island... Can I put up Links.3F so hopefully we will get a few more opinions. Johntex\^talk 06:51, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would be very good if we had more references here (instead of simple external links). I'll see what I can find. - Bevo 21:46, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Causeway

A small section about the causeway and its predecessors might be interesting and appropriate. I'll add that when I have a chance.

Geolinks

I just love those Geolinks tags! For this article we have {{Geolinks-US-cityscale|26.111935|-97.169587}} - Bevo 22:52, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:SouthPadreIsland skyline.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:SouthPadreIsland skyline.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:10, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Town or City?

South Padre Island's official website calls itself the "City of South Padre Island" but the government's website calls it a town government. I'm confused which term we should be using in which cases. Ergzay (talk) 17:24, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is what I have read on the subject. I am not from Texas, so cannot vouch for the text, but it seems that the designations "city/town/village" in Texas are equally unofficial. Викидим (talk) 18:03, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many different related locations with unclear separation in concepts

There are a bunch of related locations and pages on wikipedia with poor separation between them:

Ergzay (talk) 17:06, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Second and fourth are not exactly geographic locations: the second is a town, the fourth is a national park. The other three indeed describe the different aspects of a previously-single geography. Викидим (talk) 17:57, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Викидим I realize that, but there is substantial overlap in content. Ergzay (talk) 20:15, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I 100% agree with the need to reduce duplication. Unless Somebody "Notme" Else decides to join the discussion, or some other editors volunteer, the task might be up to you and me. I have preciously little interest in the subject (got here as part of WP:NPP, and there are currently no issues visible related to that project), but - being a team player - I can share some of the load, provided you have a plan of what is to be moved where. In particular, a WP:merge of both N and S island articles into the Padre Island might be tempting and ultimately beneficial to the encyclopedia - but I am not in the mood of shuffling hundreds of incoming links afterwards. Perhaps, we should just let sleeping dogs lie (I'd rather write an article about this saying). Викидим (talk) 22:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can see why this would be confusing. However, while Padre Island is a naturally occurring barrier island (the world's longest at ca. 110 miles), it has been cut in two by the Mansfeild Channal, a manmade canal. There is no bridge or connection. To travel from the north to the south end of the island (or vice versa), one must return to the mainland and drive nearly 200 miles. The northern two thirds and the southern third are quite different in character too: the north being largely a place of nature, the south being a well-developed tourist destination. While the South Padre Island and North Padre Island articles could potentially be merged into the Padre Island article, there is some justification in having a separate page for each. Alternatively, the South padre Island article is poorly explained (and illustrated) and needs lots of work if it is to stand alone. In any case, I am not up for the task or have the time for either.WiLaFa (talk) 23:57, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]