Talk:South Lancashire Regiment

Military history: British / European / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

Warrington - Lancashire

I don't mean to be pendantic, and I'm not exactly a military history buff. However, Warrington should be listed as Lancashire on this page for the following reasons; 1) The Regiment was created in 1881, before the Local Government Act of 1888. The Regiment was therefore based on what we now call 'historic' or 'ancient counties' of which Warrington is still apart of. 2) Even if we do suppose applying the administrative policy. The Regiment was disbanded in 1958. 14 years before the boundary changes of LGA of 1972. Therefore the Regiment was always based in Lancashire historically and administratively. 3) The contentious reason that it is nonsensical to have a Regiment County stationed in another county, which if anything, would make more it confusing for the reader.

I think in this instance it's only sensible to acknowledge the history of Warrington's association being in Lancashire, and not to be naive in presuming Warrington is not in modern day Cheshire. An index of metals (talk) 16:48, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on South Lancashire Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.regiments.org/regiments/uk/inf/040SLanc.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:20, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Citations in the lead section

So WP:LEAD suggests that leads are evaluated on a case-by-case basis for the need of citations. I think that this article's lead ought to have citations. The lead contains dates and years. Since it is just a short summary of the history section, transferring some citations from the history section to the lead should be enough. Sociable Song (talk) 18:01, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the citations as requested even though they appeared in the main text. Please observe WP:DRIVEBY. Always remember that it may be easy to fix it yourself. Dormskirk (talk) 18:13, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

South Lancashire Regiment Crest.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Military Medal: 15415 Sergeant William Henry Cartwright, 2nd Bn. South Lancashire Regiment

My grandfather William Henry Cartwright of Birkenhead was nominated for and approved for the Military Medal and was informed he would receive it within seven weeks. This occurred in 1916 when his rank was Lance Corporal. However due to the death of his commanding officers (Lieutenant Noel D. Morris and Second Lieutenant Herbert P. Peacocks) he never received it. On behalf of his grandchildren and great grandchildren it is my most sincere desire over one century later that the medal be awarded posthumously. I need your assistance in making this happen and will provide any further information that I can. Looking forward to hearing from you as soon as possible. Patricia St. George Patstgeo1972@yahoo.com 2001:5B0:46E1:B4F8:39FB:70B4:2281:A793 (talk) 22:50, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@2001:5B0:46E1:B4F8:39FB:70B4:2281:A793

Sgt. William Henry CARTWRIGHT, 2 Lancashires and my cousin are mates. Sgt. Arthur Henry BAILEY (1883-1957), BWM, VM, 1914-15 Star. 2nd and 9th South Lancashire Regiment, Prince of Wales's Volunteers. Served 1914-1920.

I may be able to steer you in the right direction. Contact me here. I will also send you a email regarding this subject.

"Pip, Squeak and Wilfred"Tjlynnjr (talk) 07:10, 6 December 2022 (UTC).[reply]