Talk:South Harz Railway

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Rail transport in Germany task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This article lacks references.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Two different railways

There seems like some confusion regarding names; there are two different railways. The standard gauge South Harz Railway (Südharzbahn) and the narrow gauge South Harz Railway Company(Südharz-Eisenbahn Gesellschaft). The article regarding the closed down narrow-gauge line only contains a redirect to this article which is incorrect (The railroads did connect though).

The German wiki article Südharz-Eisenbahn-Gesellschaft is quite good. How about just translating that article? --Full steam (talk) 14:09, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for raising this - good point. I've created the South Harz Railway Company article and changed the redirects to reflect the correct situation. It's only a start though - I haven't translated the entire article. Also the image on de.wiki needs a review before it can be transferred to Commons. But the basis is now there. --Bermicourt (talk) 17:22, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]