Talk:South End–Groesbeckville Historic District/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 04:40, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Copy changes
[edit]Geography
[edit]Within this boundary are 520 buildings; all but 13 of which are
— should be a comma, not a semicolon
They're independent clauses that can both stand alone as sentences, therefore making that change would be a comma splice.Daniel Case (talk) 21:05, 27 April 2021 (UTC)- Oh wait, I see your point. Daniel Case (talk) 21:08, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Done Daniel Case (talk) 21:09, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
History
[edit]during the second of these, the French and Indian War, corresponding to the Seven Years' War in Europe
— this part should be surrounded by emdashes, not commas, because it already has one comma inside
it seems that the descendants
— the "it seems" wording is a bit weird here
- Fixed That's because, per the source, there aren't any statistics to support this. I reworded that and a sentence elsewhere in the paragraph to make that clearer. Daniel Case (talk) 15:13, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Preservation and revitalization
[edit]one in three of the 67 percent African American residents
— wondering if this should be a bit more straightforward, likeone in three residents—in a an area that was 67 percent African American
, to be less confusing
- Consider using a {{quote box}} for the McLaughlin quote; it's the sort of thing I'd put in a callout. I wonder if the quote in the next section may also be too long. 33.3 percent similarity is a bit higher than I'd like to see.
- Fixed I usually don't put quotes like that in boxes, as long as they work inline, but I felt you had a point about maybe not quoting so much from the source. Daniel Case (talk) 01:28, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Other notes
[edit]- Article has been virtually untouched since nomination.
- The page is wonderfully rich in freely licensed images of contributing properties. They are all appropriately captioned and placed, often near discussion of the building itself.
- Yes, thank you ... since when I go up to Albany from where I live (which I was doing more frequently a decade ago when I wrote and researched this), the South End is the part of the city I come to first, so it was relatively easy to hop off I-787 and get pictures of the more important/significant buildings.
I still have the idea of taking a nice panoramic of the South End from the interstate some day. Daniel Case (talk) 05:29, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, thank you ... since when I go up to Albany from where I live (which I was doing more frequently a decade ago when I wrote and researched this), the South End is the part of the city I come to first, so it was relatively easy to hop off I-787 and get pictures of the more important/significant buildings.
Status
[edit]@Daniel Case: On hold to address the copy changes and reduce the quote; ping me when these issues are addressed. The page looks great, just was time for some fresh eyes. You've put a lot of work in, especially on the image side, and it really shows. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:04, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you. It's late so I will be working on this tomorrow. Daniel Case (talk) 05:52, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Everything looks good, will pass. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 22:04, 29 April 2021 (UTC)