Talk:South American sea lion

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

South America: Argentina / Chile / Peru / Uruguay Mid‑importance

	Latin America portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Argentina (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chile (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peru (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Uruguay (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

I just added the reference below:

Rodriguez, D., R. Bastida. 1993. The southern sea lion, Otaria byronia or Otaria flavescens?. Marine Mammal Science,gkuh

Rodriguez & Bastida (1993) re-examined the holotype of Otaria flavescens and concluded that O. flavescens is the correct name for the Southern Sea Lion. Their abstract reads:

The status of the specific name of the Southern sea lion is controversial; currently two names are in use: Otaria flavescens (Shaw, 1800) and Otaria byronia (de Blainville, 1820). The former was based on a two-foot-long yellowish otariid collected in the Strait of Magellan and the latter on a skull stated to have been collected on the Tinian Island (Marianas Archipelago); unfortunately both holotypes are lost. Otaria flavescens has date priority over Otaria byronia, but its identification was uncertain. This paper focuses on analyzing the main features of Shaw's holotype (body length, ear size, and hair color), which fit with the features of a Southern sea lion pup. As this was a tangible specimen from a valid locality and has priority over other available epithets, the specific name of the Southern sea lion should be Otaria flavescens (Shaw, 1800).

Now that these authors concluded that the holotype of O. flavescens has features consistent with those of a Southern Sea Lion pup, the controversy over the correct name for the Southern Sea Lion is over. 72.194.116.63 22:49, 14 March 2007 (UTC) Vahe Demirjian 14.49 14 March 2007[reply]