Talk:South Aiken High School

United States: South Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	South Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject South Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).

Schools

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on South Aiken High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:15, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Old unsourced athletics claims

The following had been tagged as unsourced since March 2011.

South Aiken won the AAAA State Golf Championship in 2004. The tennis team won the men's tennis state championship in 2002, 2003, and 2004. The men's soccer state championship in 2005(4A) and 2009 (3A). In the 2005 soccer season, South Aiken was ranked second in the Southern Region, and third overall in the United States.

Poking around the SCHSL site, South Aiken did win the boys' 2004 AAAA golf championship.[1]. Boys' tennis lost in the third round in 2002,[2] lost in the first round in 2003,[3], and lost in the first round in 2004.[4] Boys' soccer won AAAA in 2005[5] and won AAA in 2008;[6] JL Mann won in 2009.[7] I'm not sure how to verify the rankings, because it doesn't indicate what organization did the rankings. —C.Fred (talk) 03:37, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Generally, C.Fred, we don't discuss polls in US high school articles. Also no individual achievement, and rarely anything less than state champions. Thanks for finding the cites. John from Idegon (talk) 04:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, polls are so opinion-based and not in general use that I'm reluctant to mention them in high school articles. I'm not even sure I'd mention a power ranking in a high school sports article, even though I know of two states that use them for various purposes. —C.Fred (talk) 04:34, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Power rankings seem like WP:NOTNEWS to me. Altho generally prose is preferred to lists, I find using lists in school articles for athletic achievement cuts down on the crufty, poor excuse for a sports page garbage we frequently end up with. However, if there is something unique to discuss, that's another story. I'm thinking particularly of a school that may have gone 1-15 for the season and end up going all the way in the tournament only to lose in the finals.John from Idegon (talk) 06:54, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]