Talk:South Africa at the 2002 Winter Olympics
South Africa at the 2002 Winter Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 14, 2018. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on South Africa at the 2002 Winter Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060622162855/http://www.la84foundation.org/5va/reports_frmst.htm to http://www.la84foundation.org/5va/reports_frmst.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:38, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:South Africa at the 2002 Winter Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 20:43, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Going to take on this review. MWright96 (talk) 20:43, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Background
[edit]- "a total of 2,399 athletes took part representing 77 National Olympic Committees." - a total of 2,399 representing 77 National Olympic Committees took part.
- "The South African delegation to Salt Lake consisted" - Salt Lake City
Alpine skiing
[edit]- "which put him in 51st place out of 53 competitors who finished the race." - contest
- "with the total time of all three legs determining final placement." - determining the final positions.
- "He was faster on his second run," - Heath
- " the gold medal was won by Stephan Eberharter of Austria" - try Austria's Stephan Eberharter for some variety
- "His total time for the event was 1 minute and 56.93 seconds,, which put him in 27th place out of 33 classified finishers;" - how about rewording the text in bold to placed him 27th; for the same reason as above
Neat work overall. Found nothing major in my read-through. MWright96 (talk) 08:08, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, MWright96, I've fixed everything above. Courcelles (talk) 16:03, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Courcelles: Okay. Now promoting this article to GA status. MWright96 (talk) 19:19, 14 August 2018 (UTC)