Talk:SousVide Supreme

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Removed a bunch of copied junk

...this whole article reads like it was written by the "inventors" of this device, or was paid editing. Not that that's necessarily bad, but when the only refs are to the company's own website, that kinda says something. Removed a bunch of stuff that was simply copied and pasted from that site, and tagged a bunch of other stuff. I'm not sure this device is even notable for a Wikipedia entry, unless we're going to decree that every random appliance that you can buy online is notable. Blatant ad spam. :( – 2001:db8:: (rfc | diff) 04:44, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agree that this article doesn't add real content that couldn't be wrapped into the Sous-vide page. Propose merger. Geoff (talk) 00:53, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I removed even more! --Stefan ^talk 01:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose that SousVide Supreme be merged into Sous-vide. I think that the content in the SousVide Supreme article can easily be explained in the context of Sous-vide, and the Sous-Vide article is of a reasonable size that the merging of SousVide Supreme will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Geoff (talk) 00:55, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't merge I'm against merging into Sous-vide because then that article will have (much) more info about the product, what is in the sous vide page now is good, but we should not have much more info about the product, that would not good for that page. It should be about the term, not the product. Then maybe the proposers issue is that this page is bad, I agree, should we even have a article about SousVide Supreme? I'm pretty sure it is notable, but lets solve the issue about this page, not moving the problem to another page. So I suggest to clean up this page instead. --Stefan ^talk 01:07, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not much action here, I will take away the merge tag, anyone want to reopen please do and put a note here. --Stefan ^talk 00:59, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]