Jump to content

Talk:Sorthat Formation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:36, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Sorthat Formation/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hurricane Noah (talk · contribs) 19:20, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

will do. NoahTalk 19:20, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't forgotten about this, just ran into some unexpected issues that kept me busy. NoahTalk 11:07, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Lead
  • on the island on Bornholm, Denmark the second on should be of.
  • Pliensbachian-Late Toarcian age links for these.
  • In fact the Sorthat Formation was included on most of 80s-90s studies as the lowermost part of the Bagå Formation assume it's 1980s and 1990s? That should be specified.
  • Vulcanism assuming this was meant to be volcanism?
Prose
  • Why are certain non-proper nouns such as formation and island capitalized? This appears to be a major issue throughout the article.
  • Latter the Bagå Formation was limited This doesn't make sense?
  • Convert metric to US-based units
  • The large Toarcian–Bajocian deltaic systems locally where the shoreline influenced by the vicinity between brackish to freshwater and continental biofacies Missing something?
  • The North German Basin shows that on approximately 14.4 m.a on should be around since it isn't an exact date. I would rather you write out what m.a means since it is only used once and isn't explained elsewhere in the article.
  • What does isp. mean? it should be written in full for the first usage and then abbreviated thereafter.
  • Recommend adding alt text to images.
  • The Bifrons to Levesquei Zone in the coeval units at the east and west of Prignitz a sandy coastal-deltaic succession was replaced by laminated shales with pelagic marine fauna Feels like the sentence is jumbled.
  • what contributed to retrogradational stratal pattern architectures What should be which
  • On the Sorthat Formation is present a transition from upper to lower shoreface environments This is also jumbled.
  • In the Younger Levesquei subzone delta plain Comma after this phrase.
  • Slashes should not be used between two words per MOS:SLASH as it doesn't show how two things are related.
  • analisis misspelling.
  • Later a rise in the sea level is reported due to the increase of Acritarchs and Tasmanites, where a lagoon succession overlain by the fill of a coastal lake that developed into a paleosol verb tense.
  • and the location become again a crevasse delta and fill of an abandoned fluvial channel this is jumbled.
  • suggest he transition to crevasse deltas formed by the amalgamation of crevasse splay deposits and infill of crevasse channels typo and missing some wording.
  • Some sand beds originated probably on the granite horst better as probably originated.
  • Korsodde Section overlies the fine-grained sandstones of the Hasle Formation Add "The" to the beginning.
  • This section of the formation started as a derived of sand units deposited in fluvial channels, with abundant carbonaceous matter was probably derived this looks clanky
  • Is overlaid by the intercalation of crevasse delta deposits and lacustrine-brackish flooding surfaces What is?
  • O several coal seams there were found several Biomolecules ?
  • being most of them found associated to sandy channel fills and on heavily rooted crevasse and lake deposits in shallow inter-fluvial areas Clanky
  • On the Toarcian at Bornholm strata indicates a warm, humid climate Don't think on is appropriate here. There needs to be a comma after climate.
  • that implies the influence of greater transportation energies imply
  • loads of duplicate links.
Unfortunately, I am going to be quick failing this nomination due to Grammatical issues as I haven't even scratched the surface. There are numerous occurrences of subject-verb agreement issues, tense issues, misspellings, missing words, etc.. I recommend a thorough copyediting before nominating for GAN again. Excellent work on sourcing though. NoahTalk 23:50, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyediting

[edit]

I'd like to let everyone know that I'll be taking up the task of checking and rewriting this article on the front of spelling and grammar. Cheers, -TimTheDragonRider (talk) 18:48, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, @TimTheDragonRider: I didn't see your note. I've been copyediting (it's been in the 'Bio in need of CE' queue for a long time). Didn't mean to step on any toes.