Talk:Sorrow (emotion)

Requested move 30 March 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move. — Music1201 ^talk 00:24, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorrow (emotion) → Sorrow
Sorrow → Sorrow (disambiguation)

– It seems rather WP:ASTONISH-ing that the concept of "sorrow" is not the primary topic. All other terms on the disambiguation page get their names based on/from the emotion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:38, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly, I Support this very sad proposal. Common name, etc. Randy Kryn 00:20, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment shouldn't sorrows also redirect to the emotion? -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 02:35, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support, per long-term significance. All other topics named "sorrow" are derived from the emotion. SST flyer 07:15, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. This should stay a disambiguation page. Looking at recent pageviews, the emotion article is #5 on the list, and well behind some of the others. No topic has more than the others combined. It's better for our readers to send them to a dab page rather than an article that only 8% of them are interested in. Dohn joe (talk) 14:22, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support due to long-term significance. Egsan Bacon (talk) 18:32, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as no coherent reason for a primarytopic grab has been presented. Dicklyon (talk) 05:47, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Dohn joe is 100% right. Nohomersryan (talk) 14:52, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The emotion is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC due to the long-term significance. (by the way, Dohn joe's analysis is skewed towards recent events. Sorrow (The McCoys song) was covered by David Bowie and got a lot of recognition soon after his death. Before Bowie's death, the emotion was the top result in that same analysis) -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:38, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Even if you go back to last summer, the emotion page got no more than 16% of the pageviews - that's still 84% going to a different article. Dohn joe (talk) 17:44, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, because although the emotion is the basis for everything else, that doesn't mean it's a clear primary topic. The whole set of articles around this spread the page views around quite thinly. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 16:29, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Seven

चिंता व्यक्त करें 2409:4064:4E8F:68F5:483C:A055:D43E:4444 (talk) 12:00, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]