Talk:Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Reaction

I realize this is a brand new article. And thanks to it's author(s).

Not enthused about the "reaction." This was a state statute that was struck down by the US Supreme Court. It seems to me that any "reaction" at this point, should be appeals by Vermont for "review;" a resolution passing Congress, certainly not merely submitting one to a committee that he, as a Democrat, can't get to the floor; maybe a statement by the President, or maybe something passed by the US Senate. Or a new law passed by the Vt. legislature that is deliberately worded to avoid the objections of this decision.

And knee-jerk reaction by partisan assessors. I realize that this may be all that is available at this point. We may have to wait for objective reaction from scholarly sources. But maybe some of the reaction could be eliminated until that time. Student7 (talk) 23:45, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good point. I included reactions from both the left and the right in order to achieve WP:NPOV, but perhaps these reactions are not notable enough to include. I've gone ahead and commented out the reaction for now. Sailing to Byzantium (talk) 23:53, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]