Jump to content

Talk:Sorga Ka Toedjoe/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Drmies (talk · contribs) 03:51, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
  • Crisco, why'd you trim the second image? Drmies (talk) 03:54, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Can you rephrase "extensively featured"? It sounds like K-pop writing. Moreover, the 30 October 1940 review praises the music and says it was supervised by Kartolo--the latter point is worthwhile mentioning in the lead since he has an article and was a songwriter as well. It notes that several other actors came from the "world of music"--I think that's enough for a sentence or two in the Production section. [Update: wait, you have that covered to some extent with "Roekiah, Kartolo, Landauw, and Titing were experienced kroncong singers." So nevermind, I suppose--"NVM"?] Drmies (talk)