Talk:Soprillo

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Jazz Low‑importance

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that one or more audio files of a musical instrument or component be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and included in this article to improve its quality by demonstrating the way it sounds or alters sound. Please see Wikipedia:Requested recordings for more on this request.

Redirect

I added a redirect to Soprillo at Soprillo saxophone, but I was wondering if perhaps this article would be better placed in its entirety at Soprillo saxophone with the redirect here? ~Dramaticbassx

The redirect is a good idea, though I have never heard anyone refer to the instrument as "soprillo saxophone" or "soprillo sax," just "soprillo." Do you know something I don't? Badagnani 18:57, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I and some of my friends sometimes refer to it as a "soprillo sax," though that doesn't really justify anything. However, Eppelsheim's website refers to it both as just "Soprillo" and "Soprillo Bb piccolo saxophone." It appears that either is correct. ChaosMaster (talk) 18:32, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

I can't see the picture of soprillo sax. Could anybody complement the picture? thx Skalpik 88.100.153.206 20:26, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Year of creation

What year was it created/released? Badagnani 05:16, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalized name

I think Soprillo is probably a registered trademark of Benedikt Eppelsheim Blasinstrumente GMBH. Therefore I have changed it to be capitalized throughout the article. --—Preceding unsigned comment added by SaxTeacher (talk • contribs)

Upper register

This text was just removed:

"and its upper register extends to a fifth above the sopranino saxophone"

If incorrect, please include substitute wording (perhaps compare its register to the soprano rather than the more unfamiliar sopranino). Badagnani 03:28, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that was covered by the two statements that: 1. it's an octave above soprano, 2. but keywork only goes to Eb, not F. - Special-T (talk) 13:38, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Range

Surely the range shown in the graphic (starting at B-flat3) is an octave too low? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.230.72.70 (talk) 19:00, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Badagnani (talk) 19:20, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move

I moved this from soprillo to Sopranissimo saxophone because it appears that soprillo is just it's commercial name.username 1 (talk) 05:52, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Invention date

Who invented this? I have found no evidence or indication that Adolphe Sax did. Shiggity (talk) 21:43, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sopranissimo saxophone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051222223039/http://www.saxchoir.com/index.php to http://www.saxchoir.com/index.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:29, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Name

Does anyone really call this instrument anything other than either the "soprillo", or the "piccolo saxophone"? I've had a lot of trouble tracking down where the term "sopranissimo" came from in this context, that isn't connected to this Wikipedia article (renamed in 2009), and saxophonists I know who know of its existence (here in NZ) call it the soprillo. Eppelsheim is still its only maker as far as I am aware. Happy to be disproven/enlightened, but I think we should rename this article appropriately. — Jon (talk) 06:41, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think the point is that "Soprillo" is Eppelsheim's brand name for this instrument. A name that would be consistent with other instrument names would be "Sopranissimo". - Special-T (talk) 14:06, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Special-T asserting what it ought to be called is beside the point: nobody actually calls it the sopranissimo, all evidence I can find is that somebody just asserted that name here 15-20 years ago and it stuck. It's either a soprillo or a piccolo saxophone. Piccolo is also just as consistent, if not more, c.f. piccolo (flute), piccolo trumpet, piccolo trombone, piccolo oboe, etc. — Jon (talk) 20:52, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed - I'm not advocating for "sopranissimo", just pointing out why there might be some legitimacy to that designation. "Piccolo" would be (AFAIK) equally tradition-consistent. Plus, "tradition-consistent" might not be that important (although I think it's helpful for clarity's sake). - Special-T (talk) 21:35, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since April 2023, I have not been able to find any reliable sources that refer to this instrument as sopranissimo, that aren't also WP:CIRCULAR references that point here, where it was arbitrarily renamed from soprillo in 2009. In what little material I can find, it is either simply called the soprillo or occasionally piccolo saxophone. Eppelsheim on his website calls it a B♭-Piccolo-Saxophon, which is wikt:straight from the horse's mouth; CD liner notes by Nigel Wood (Soprillogy) and Vinny Golia (and Cook & Morton's 2006 Penguin Guide entry on the same) call it the soprillo. There is not (yet) any mention of the soprillo, or more generally the piccolo-size of saxophone (or even the word "sopranissimo") in the Grove Dictionary of Instruments (2014), or anywhere else in Grove/OMO, or even the German language MGG Online. Cottrell does not mention the tubax or soprillo in The Saxophone (Yale Instruments series, 2012), which is a curious omission. Of the 11 Wikipedia articles in other languages linked to the Q163026 Wikidata item, Czech uses "sopranissimový saxofon", Italian uses "sassofono sopranissimo", French uses "saxophone piccolo", the rest use "soprillo". In light of this, and unless there's something obvious I've missed, I think we should consider a move proposal to move this article either back to soprillo, or perhaps piccolo saxophone if we want to capture the more general idea of a ninth teeny-tiny size/class of saxophone. — Jon (talk) 05:00, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On one hand, I found one printed source, Music: The Definitive Visual History (DK, 2013) which uses the term sopranissimo. On the other, I've done some more reading of guidelines (particularly WP:CRITERIA, WP:NCM) and it's clear the article title needs to be the most common name for the thing (which is pretty clearly "Soprillo") with categorised redirects for synonyms (piccolo saxophone and sopranissimo saxophone). I suppose once someone else starts manufacturing one, and calls it something else, we can burn that bridge when we get to it and figure out what the size class of saxophone is really called then (although we already have Eppelsheim calling it a piccolo saxophone). — Jon (talk) 20:00, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]