Talk:Sophie Germain

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Women's History High‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women scientists High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mathematics High‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-priority on the project's priority scale.

France Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on April 1, 2017, April 1, 2020, and April 1, 2024.

Request for photos of Sophie Germains' home

Hello, I need help with finding some pictures of Sophie Germains' home—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.183.232.205 (talk • contribs) 00:39, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Missing conditions

"if x, y, and z are integers, and x5 + y5 = z5 then either x, y, or z has to be divisible by five. " I think some conditions are omitted here. The nontrivial case has no solutions (see Fermat), so it appears to me quite meaningless to say that these non-existing solutions have to be divisible by 5. On the other hand, in the trivial case x=0 and y=z, none of them has to be divisable by 5.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.11.216.65 (talk • contribs) 06:43, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

in case you are not aware, the result known as 'fermat's last theorem' was not proved by fermat but by Andrew Wiles in 1995. therefore it was entirely meaningful for germain to prove that any possible solutions to x^5 + y^5 = z^5 must be divisible by 5 at the start of the nineteenth century. see Fermat's Last Theorem. hope this helps. Via strass 08:47, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sophie Germain was born into a wealthy family and self taught herself from her dads books in his libary.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 199.164.68.202 (talk • contribs) 19:45, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Theme

How did she do that math? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.106.252.2 (talk) 15:19, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

155.106.252.2 is very vague.

1808

We are told that Gauss's interests shifted to applied maths after 1808. Actually, he studied non-Euclidean geometry after 1808. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.157.27.16 (talk) 09:51, 26 May 2009 (UTC) It is hard to tell pure and applied maths from one another, anyway. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.157.27.16 (talk) 10:03, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blame the victim

"Because of her gender, she was unable to make a career out of mathematics, but worked independently throughout her life." If puritanism demands use of a social and cultural construct (gender) rather than the underlying biological determinant (sex) then so be it but neither was the cause of Sophie Germain's inability to undertake a career in mathematics. It was the prejudices of society, largely those of men, that denied her such a career. As a woman she was perfectly capable intellectually and physically to follow such a career, it was the physical obstruction of men that prevented her admittance to the relevant institutions. Chrysippo (talk) 11:00, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's the point, it was just poorly worded, or perhaps poorly read. Boneyard90 (talk) 06:21, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Undefined variable

In Sophie_Germain#Best_work_on_Fermat's_Last_Theorem, there is an undefined "N". I should imagine that it should be a whole number. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.244.183.112 (talk) 09:07, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

N is not undefined in this case. The equation is in a subsection under "Later work in number theory". Number theory deals only with integers. In mathematics N is often used to represent integers, while a variable like X would be used otherwise. StarryGrandma (talk) 17:56, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If N=0, P=1. 1 is not now treated as a prime.

Thanks, It turns out there is more to it than simply N. It did need a definition and I've added "(N any positive integer not divisible by 3)". StarryGrandma (talk) 18:46, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chladni vibration figures award

Petrovich 1999 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/30053914) states Germain won the prize for calculating Chladni vibration figures, and she was the only contest left. However, this link gives a different account, where the other competitors '.. prisoners of the ruling paradigm, consideration of the underlying molecular structure theorized for materials. The mathematical methodologies appropriate to the molecular view could not cope with the problem.' Jonpatterns (talk) 20:36, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sophie Germain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141129202400/http://www.academie-sciences.fr/activite/prix/laureat_germain.pdf to http://www.academie-sciences.fr/activite/prix/laureat_germain.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:48, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Osen unreliable

This article has approximately 7 footnotes (some repeated multiple times) sourced to Osen 1974. Osen was not careful about the provenance of her claims and cannot be considered a reliable source; see Talk:Hypatia for a more detailed discussion of this issue. Can we work to eliminate this reference and base everything on better sources, please? —David Eppstein (talk) 23:20, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]