Talk:Sons & Daughters (2006 TV series)

Requested move

Sons and Daughters (TV) → Sons & Daughters – The title is Sons & Daughters, not Sons and Daughters. Furthermore, Sons & Daughters is a redirect. — DrBat 03:30, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Sons & Daughters (US TV). Move Sons and Daughters to Sons and Daughters (Australian TV). Turn Sons and Daughters into a disambig page, and redirect Sons & Daughters and Sons and Daughters (TV) to that disambig. -Sean Curtin 19:34, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment; I'd support this. --DrBat 01:20, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Move and create the disambiguation page as Sean said.Timize 11:54, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've made it Sons & Daughters (US TV series) and Sons and Daughters (Australian TV series). —Nightst a llion (?) ^{Seen this already?} 10:02, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NBC network shows

Is there a reason why Sons is categorized under NBC network shows? It's an ABC network show. -Timize 12:45, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dysfunctional? Not at all.

I think the original writer of this article misunderstands the notion of dysfunction. What makes this show truly great is that it is more true-to-life than other "family" comedies. This family does have problems, any family does, but is hardly dysfunctional as evidenced by most plot lines being advanced by characters doing their best to make other family members know they care about them, or have their best interest at heart and are preventing them from emotional harm. This is actually a very effective and functional family that takes obstacles and deals with them together, shouldering the burden of the human condition together.

All in all, this needs to be addressed to be more accurate to avoid using misunderstood buzzwords.

Fair use rationale for Image:Sons&dagutherslogo.png

Image:Sons&dagutherslogo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:26, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sonsandaughters.PNG

Image:Sonsandaughters.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cameron&liz.jpg

Image:Cameron&liz.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]