Talk:Sonny Matula/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: TheNuggeteer (talk · contribs) 06:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Flemmish Nietzsche (talk · contribs) 08:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work, TheNuggeteer, but unfortunately I'm going to have to have to quickfail this GA nomination. It fits two of the criteria under Wikipedia:Good article criteria for an immediate failure:

It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria
It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include {{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags (See also {{QF}})

This article is very short (only 341 words) and while that does not disqualify an article from being a Good Article, Good Articles should be well written and address the main aspects of the topic, and this article does unfortunately not do those things — I would suggest you expand the lead, and the article in general, to explain beyond just one sentence to explain the Notability and role of this person. As it is this article does not even say this man is a Filipino politician or what office(s) he holds in the lead, and spends only three sentences on his career. Please see MOS:LEAD and thoroughly read the Good Article criteria so that you know the standards Good Articles are expected to meet.

Secondly, this article's {{Notability}} tag has not been properly addressed — the citations still do not show and demonstrate the notability of this subject, and need to show significant coverage in sources independent of the subject.

This article did not receive a thorough review, and may not meet other parts of the good article criteria. I encourage you to remedy this problem (and any others) and resubmit it for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a Good article reassessment. Thank you for your work so far. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 08:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.