Talk:Songjiang Square Pagoda

A fact from Songjiang Square Pagoda appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 December 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the reliquary of the 11th-century Buddhist monk Miaoyuan was rediscovered in 1975 during repairs to Songjiang's Square Pagoda?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Songjiang Square Pagoda.

Wikipedia

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Buddhism Mid‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

So

ok--Drt drt boy (talk) 21:29, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, not ok. You need to actually look around for the thing's COMMON ENGLISH NAME, not just dump a ridiculous amount of untranslated and unexplained Chinese citations into a machine-translated stub. "New China" isn't a thing in English. At the very least, redirects were in order from the thing's more common names. —

Llywelyn II

05:30, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moved

To Songjiang Square Pagoda, since that seems to be the thing's most common English name per cursory Google Books searching. There are a minimal number of translations, though, so, if there's an official English name from the district government or culture ministry, we should use that. — $Llywelyn II$ 06:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for future article expansion

The Chinese-language citation spam mentioned above is commented out here:

Kindly restore it to the article as it is explained and used to cite specific points in the text. — $Llywelyn II$ 05:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]