Talk:Son of Beast/Archive 1
 | This non-existent page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Son of Beast. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Infobox Picture
- I am not sure if the Son of Beast article should have a picture of it with the former loop. In
the meantime, I have added a caption for the picture, explaining the loop. 96.234.7.149 17:49, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- "Before" and "after" is not a bad idea. 147.70.242.40 (talk) 23:22, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- we can put the logo for the mail picture and use the picture with the loop in the article.--Nickvet419 (talk) 04:31, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- "Before" and "after" is not a bad idea. 147.70.242.40 (talk) 23:22, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Speculation
- The entire first paragraph is almost all speculation. I removed the most obvious instance, but the rest of it seems to fall into that category as well. It's not very encyclopedic, and someone really needs to work on it. I would, but I've never ridden it and I'm not sure what to write. Please fix it, though. Thank you. -- Interrupt_feed (talk) 15:22, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Remove personal speculation from the first paragraph: "Son of Beast has been considered by many roller coaster buffs as one of the biggest "busts" of all-time, due to its intense roughness and high bumpiness throughout the ride." Mdnky (talk) 03:09, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- 2009 Injury - was the person 39 or 60 years old? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.45.81.25 (talk) 02:57, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Rumors
Heard a rumor that SOB is in the contract workings of getting a steal track upgrade. Something like Texas Giant got upgraded with.ref Hopefully they will also bring back the loop. --Nickvet419 (talk) 17:19, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
I forgot to hang my banner in all the excitement! :)
Also, I noticed that you re-wikilinked "roller coaster" in the lead, I already removed it once, and it's not wrong to have it there, but it does seem a bit unnecessary on an illustrated article explaining a roller coaster., as per wp:overlink, but that's just my opinion, I'm not upset about it either way. :) --Despayre (talk) 01:47, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Unofficial Confirmation of Demolition
Even though it's not official (could be a rumor), keep an eye out for any official confirmation. Hooky-i-vanisher (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:46, 9 May 2012 (UTC).